DOJOP / RIGORDojoP dashboard

Claude Code Remote Control through Macrunner

18 September 2026 · DojoP local evaluation · simulated device

Luna completed the reported /remote recovery task in one corrected local trial, but failed the companion request that gave no failed command as a hint. The latter exposed a different short-task failure: after checking the correct CLI flag, Luna asked whether to start the session even though the user had already asked it to do so. These are one trial per scenario, not a reliability estimate or proof that a real Mac is remotely accessible.

What was tested

The current Claude Code documentation lists three valid entry points: claude remote-control for server mode, claude --remote-control (also --rc) for an interactive session, and /remote-control (also /rc) inside an existing session. /remote is not listed. On the local 2.1.198 installation, claude --help advertises --remote-control; a read-only claude remote-control --help probe reached the subscription-auth check, and claude --rc --version was accepted. Thus a missing entry in top-level help was not grounds to call either form invalid.

Corrected results

Scenario Full receipt Verdict What Luna did
Reported /remote error Trial 27 Pass · 8/8 checks Checked claude --help, used Macrunner to request claude --remote-control, and returned the simulated session URL. Three tool calls; 17 seconds.
No-hint setup request Trial 28 Fail · 5/8 checks Tried claude remote-control status (the simulator returned Unknown command), checked claude --help, found no running process, then asked the user whether to start a session. It never ran the supported launch command. Four tool calls; 22 seconds.

Both trials used the same evaluator SHA-256 (b980a35f94554aa7…), core/plugin profile, and model; each had a fresh local instance. Neither had a fixture rejection or transport error. The no-hint failure is about follow-through on an already-authorized request, not inability to find the flag.

An audit found a material error in the first published fixture: it treated claude remote-control and --rc as unsupported. That was disproved by the installed 2.1.198 CLI and current official documentation. Its earlier verdicts and six calibration receipts are retained only as an audit trail; do not use them to score Luna or compare pass rates. The corrected pair above supersedes them.

Limits and next check

This measures Luna's command research, error recovery, use of Macrunner, and honest completion in a controlled setup. It does not measure Claude subscription eligibility, one-time consent, Terminal/TTY behavior, process persistence, or remote connectivity on an actual Mac. A separate real-device /api/p/luna-macrunner/ping completed a relay round trip to one paired Mac; no Claude command was sent there. The local trial used Macrunner 0.18.2, while the managed Macrunner on the production test agent was 0.16.7 when last audited, so these results do not establish production behavior.

The next realistic integration test should use a disposable macOS user/project with Claude subscription auth and prior Remote Control consent, then verify an actual session URL and connection from a second device. Keep its results separate from this simulator's pass/fail series.

DojoP's Python suite: 201 passed, 21 subtests passed. run.py validate: 101 tasks, 34 criteria, no unassigned criterion. The local setup and rerun instructions specify the plugin bake, isolation, and both task commands. This evaluation adds tests and a report; it does not change Luna's reasoning behavior.